You are here:

Last reviewed on 29 May 2020
Ref: 3693
School types: All · School phases: All

Be clear on the pros and cons of different committee structures so you can choose the right monitoring method for your board.

No committees

Maintained school governing boards aren't required to have any committees. So some choose to operate without them - this is also known as the 'circle' model

Pros

  • It's easier for the chair and headteacher to maintain strategic control of the agenda and decision-making
  • There aren't specialisms - so everyone has a degree of proficiency across all areas of governance
  • All governors have access to information and reporting at the same time - this can avoid repetition and prevent mixed messages
  • It can promote teamwork among governors
  • Some decisions can only be made by the full governing board, so it may save discussion time
  • No committees means the chair and headteacher may be able to manage communications more effectively, especially if the school is going through significant change or crisis
  • There may be fewer meetings, so governor participation may improve
  • No need to agree terms of reference or committee membership

Chair and headteacher could have excessive influence over proceedings May

More from The Key

The Key has taken great care in publishing this article. However, some of the article's content and information may come from or link to third party sources whose quality, relevance, accuracy, completeness, currency and reliability we do not guarantee. Accordingly, we will not be held liable for any use of or reliance placed on this article's content or the links or downloads it provides. This article may contain information sourced from public sector bodies and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.