Boards without committees – the 'circle model' of governance

Be clear on how this model is different, what you should focus on and what you can do to make it work.

Last reviewed on 10 February 2025
School types: AllSchool phases: AllRef: 5715
Contents
  1. What makes it different
  2. If you're making this change 
  3. Switch up the focus of your agenda throughout the year
  4. Set up working parties to tackle time-consuming problems
  5. Examples of the 'circle model' in practice
  6. Practical tips for a successful transition

Our associate governance experts, Fred Birkett, Ian Preston and Fee Stagg helped us with this article.

What makes it different

The task of monitoring specific areas has traditionally been assigned to committees. In the 'circle model', it's delegated to individuals or pairs instead. These are sometimes called 'link' or 'nominated' trustees or governors.

Some boards choose to have committees alongside link governor/trustees (known as a 'hybrid model'). Academies will always need an audit and risk committee, but whether you choose to keep any other committees is up to you. 

Like all things, this model has its pros and cons.

If you're making this change 

It should be about keeping your board effective. For example, if you have a small number of governors or trustees, it might be more effective not to have committees. This could be for a short period of time if you plan to build board